What Lawie AI Does and Does Not Do
Understand the permitted role of AI assistance, mandatory human review, and the boundary between evidence and generated interpretation.
Overview
Understand the permitted role of AI assistance, mandatory human review, and the boundary between evidence and generated interpretation.
Audience
- Lawyer
- Admin
- Compliance
- Ops
Product Area
AI Governance
Prerequisites
- None.
Steps
- Treat output as assisted work
Lawie can retrieve, classify, summarize, compare, draft, and route work within configured scopes; it does not acquire professional authority.
- Verify consequential claims
Review sources, jurisdiction, dates, confidence, missing evidence, and approval requirements before relying on an output.
- Keep humans accountable
A qualified person must approve legal, regulatory, financial, employment, surveillance, or reputationally consequential action.
Expected Result
Users can explain which parts of a result are sourced facts, model-supported interpretation, unresolved uncertainty, and human decision.
Security and Audit Notes
- Do not use Lawie to bypass authorization, confidentiality, privilege, due process, or audit controls.
- Report unsafe or unsupported output through the documented feedback and escalation paths.
Limits and Preconditions
- AI output may be incomplete, outdated, ambiguous, or wrong.
- Lawie does not provide autonomous legal advice or make final consequential decisions.
Troubleshooting
- Fluent language is mistaken for verified fact: Require source support and use the absence of evidence as a stop condition.
Related Articles
Escalation
If the documented result cannot be reached after the checks above, capture the workspace identifier, affected product area, timestamp, and a redacted error message, then use Support. Never include secrets, privileged legal content, or customer documents in the initial report.